A WOMAN feels the main drawback to the ‘doggy-style’ sexual position is how massively degrading its name is.
Lauren Hewitt says having sex from behind is most likely to give her pleasure from her partner’s inept humping, but is less keen on the horrifying images conjured by the name.
Hewitt said: “It’s one of the few positions Steve can manage that I actually enjoy, and I can’t deny that not seeing his idiotic face when he comes is a plus.
“But call me old-fashioned, I just don’t enjoy being compared to a humping Alsatian when I’m having sex. Have you ever smelled a dog’s breath? It’s not good. I also don’t have a freakishly large number of tits, roll in fox shit or think the height of cuisine is a stinking can of condemned meat.
“Nor do I have any of the other repulsive habits of dogs. I’m fully house-trained, for example. Is that the message I’m sending out whenever I do it doggy-style with a guy – ‘I’m a woman who shits in the garden’?
“Also, dogs are notoriously stupid. I’ve got a 2:1 in Modern History from Durham, so I find that particularly insulting.”
Hewitt’s partner Steve said: “I don’t see what Lauren’s problem is. She’s not actually a dog. We occasionally do reverse cowgirl, but that doesn’t mean that she’s ever herded cattle on a ranch.
“Although it is my favourite sexual position. I’ve always had a thing about Lady and the Tramp.”