BBC hoping no one's noticed it's repeating itself

THE BBC is hoping no viewers have realised its Royal coverage has been the same 25 minutes of content repeated endlessly for the past six days.

Having run out of things to say about Her Majesty roughly 45 minutes after her death, BBC News was faced with the problem of how to fill the next 300 hours of blanket coverage.

Head of BBC Royal Programming Tom Logan said: “Once we’d done the basic bits about service, corgis, paying respects and her learning to drive a truck in the war, we were struggling a bit.

“The trouble is, the secret of her success was that she never actually said anything about anything. Which is one way of staying out trouble but a bugger when you’re trying to get any sense of what she was actually like.

“We were down to an anecdote about her admiring a carpet on a visit to a Job Centre in Northallerton. Apparently she said ‘That’s nice’. That’s when I realised we were f**ked. 

“We’ve started looping exactly the same content. Service, corgis, paying respects and her learning to drive a truck in the war. We were concerned that viewers might wonder how or why Nicholas Witchell apparently hasn’t taken a toilet break since September 8th, or eaten, slept or changed clothes.

“Fortunately, we’ve had no complaints yet. Thank Christ everyone’s watching Netflix or down the pub or we’d be shafted.”

Five ways the queue is not uniquely British

THE three-mile queue for the Queen’s lying-in-state is not as British as everyone says it is. Here’s why.

Britain didn’t invent queuing

The origins of queuing are lost to the mists of time, meaning nobody knows who invented it. Even though everyone associates standing in an orderly line with Britain, the Chinese probably came up with the idea centuries before we got round to it. But just like everything in the British Museum, we stole it and claimed it as our own.

It’s well-organised

The queue for the lying-in-state is a masterpiece of planning. It has toilets, airport-style security and an accessibility route, all of which is about as un-British as it gets. A proper British queue would be a bloated, costly affair run by Tory donors which demonises asylum seekers. Any of its failings would of course be blamed on the Labour Party.

It’s free

Britain is a greedy country currently in the grip of late-stage capitalism, meaning the existence of a free queue snaking its way through London is a bizarre anomaly. By rights it should charge people 20 quid every 100 metres, before being sold off to France who will make a massive profit out of it. Nothing could be more British than that.

Other countries queue

Queuing is a popular British stereotype, along with drinking tea and having crooked teeth, but why? Other countries wait in line every day and have the decency not to get all possessive about it. Meanwhile the presence of the Queen gives the whole ceremony a faintly Germanic air. Our ‘queue nationalism’ is a hypocritical farce, which is admittedly very British.

Everyone’s well-behaved

Anyone who’s ever waited to get into a nightclub or football ground will tell you the British are not the most civil of queuers. A fight is always on the brink of breaking out, someone’s usually chanting Sweet Caroline, and there’s always some bastard trying to cut in. None of this is happening at the lying-in-state, but mainly because there’s loads of armed guards about.