Why Timothee Chalamet must date someone classier and more cultured than Kylie Jenner: an open letter

By Lucy Parry, aged 23, an appreciator of generational acting talent

ONCE again, the sensitive, intelligent, intellectual actor Timotheé Chalamet has let his audience down by continuing his relationship with trash Kylie Jenner. 

They were pictured together at the Baftas last night. Him slim, soulful, capable of deep thought and stroking my hair while he reads me Joyce. Her, superficial with fake tits.

The tragedy of him falling for her in the first place is understandable. While seeming so sophisticated, with his pale skin, green eyes and slim build, he is unworldly and naive. Whereas she is a crocodile given human form.

Raised in the Kardashian pit, fighting her siblings for any scrap of fame or recognition, instincts honed to strike without hesitation, he never stood a chance. He walked by her at a Hollywood party and was in her jaws before he could blink.

But he’s been with her a while now. The delectable accent over the second E of his name must be trembling with wrongness at her vacuous lifestyle. He must know he needs to escape.

Freeing himself would, for one as intellectual as Timotheé, be trivial. All he has to do is pick up a volume by Molière or travel more than a mile from a boutique hotel and she will be powerless to follow.

Then he will be free to date someone more suitable, like Chloe Grace Moretz or Gracie Abrams, and leave Kylie to graze in her natural habitat of dimwitted baseball millionaires.

It’s for your own good, Timotheé. If someone had intervened like this when Leonardo was your age, he wouldn’t still be f**king teenage models on a yacht aged 50. I’m saving you from that dreadful fate.

War! I knew something was missing, says Starmer

KEIR Starmer has admitted he knew something was missing from the wonderful state of Britain he was so lucky as to inherit, and it turns out war was it. 

The prime minister has been dogged by a nagging sense that a moribund economy, inflation, collapsing public services and immense national debt were not quite enough, and has now found the final piece of the puzzle.

He said “War! That was it! A protracted, expensive and demoralising war!

“I admit I had entertained hopes of a nice little Falklandsy one in 2028, easily won and vote-boosting, but this seems like the full nightmarish quagmire that’s impossible to extricate your country from. The old Starmer luck’s come good again.

“So now I’ve got to rebuild a chronically underfunded army, explain to the young there’s no mental health days on the frontline, and somehow stay friends with a rabid White House f**kwit who takes the continued existence of Europe as a personal slight.

“I could try not to get involved, but that tends not to go well for Britain, our continental neighbours and despots hell-bent on military advances. And even the gammons into this kind of thing don’t like me.

“Oh well, war it is. Good thing you didn’t elect a leftie!”