Why are girls are underperforming at maths? A tradwife and a 1970s sexist debate

FEMALE pupils are underperforming at maths and science. Here tradwife Hannah Tomlinson and unreconstructed 1970s sexist Roy Hobbs ask what can be done: 

Hannah: The problem is that maths isn’t like making cupcakes. If maths was cupcake-based girls would excel at it. I’m not sure how you’d divide 25 cupcakes by seven without getting crumbs everywhere, but that would mean more cleaning and tidying for me, so yay!

Roy: We’ve got to accept that men and women’s brains are different shapes, which is why women can’t visualise cubes or drive. We need to give girls academic subjects more suited to their gender, like O-level Breastfeeding.

Hannah: Maths has always been for men – Pythagoras much? – and as a society we undermine traditional male roles at our peril. If a man is doing equations and his partner says ‘Move the known variable over the equals sign and make it negative’ his self-esteem will be crushed. Erectile dysfunction would be a direct consequence.

Roy: I can’t not think about erections in case I become a poofter, but Hannah’s right. Some bird banging on about the Fibonacci Sequence when you’re trying to watch The Sweeney, or not having your tea on the table because she’s been daydreaming about cosines all day, could ruin a marriage.

Hannah: There’s also the issue that boys tend to be more confident and demanding in lessons, which means they get all the teacher’s attention. Which I totally agree with.

Roy: What’s the point of girls doing maths anyway? You don’t need it to be an air hostess, nurse, dinner lady, receptionist or one of Pan’s People. Frankly I’m having difficulty seeing the problem here.

Hannah: I hate to disagree, Roy, because as a man you’re automatically right, but I believe women shouldn’t have jobs at all. As a tradwife I strongly feel all your time should be devoted to housework, preparing a meals and being attractive. Apart from your podcast. Spending 50 hours a week making optimised content on professional editing software doesn’t count as a job, obviously.

Roy: I didn’t understand that, but if we want women to be able to do maths for some reason, we’ve got to give them the right incentives. So if a woman gets a place at Cambridge to study maths, she automatically get on Countdown. Riley’s getting on a bit.

Hannah: I still feel being proficient at maths is unfeminine and threatening to men. In my perfect world women would be functionally innumerate and illiterate, like The Handmaid’s Tale but with pilates classes.

Man efficiently bins birthday card straight after reading

A METHODICAL man has opened a birthday card from a friend, read its message, then placed it directly in the bin as its purpose is complete. 

After extracting the card from its envelope and absorbing all information on the front and interior, 32-year-old Tom Booker put the card straight in the recycling on the basis it could be of no further use.

He said: “My housemates treated this as an outrage. Apparently it’s a social faux pas to immediately dispose of something you neither want or need.

“Instead, I’m required to follow the odd social norm of displaying it for a customarily vague amount of time on a windowsill or mantelpiece, so every time a draught knocks it down I’m reminded I recently had a birthday.

“Perhaps I could have handled the situation better. I could have read ‘Happy birthday, Tom’ a second time, or taken notes. But I really felt I’d taken everything from it I could.

“Really, it’s the manufacturer’s fault. They should indicate the expected display time of the card on the back. And ideally if the ones with shit jokes about wine and ageing could have a very short expiry time that would be great.”

Tom’s friend Helen said: “I bought that card from a train station Postmark on my way here. It cost £5.75, so I expect him to mount it on the wall or make a small shrine around it.”