The toilet, and five other places smartphones can never be banned

BANNING mobile phones in schools makes sense because why should they have fun? But in these sacred spaces devices should always be allowed:

The loo

Once there was only a battered Giles book and an ashtray. But now we’ve experienced the buzz of scrolling through a friend’s holiday pictures while undergoing bowel movements, there’s no going back. It has become the world’s happy place.

At your work desk

A break from your big work screen to look at your little smartphone screen is a busman’s holiday, but in the time-slowed wasteland of office life you take what you can get. Besides, your work screen is filled with dreary emails and confusing spreadsheets, but your smartphone screen contains break-up texts and an eBay auction you’ve lost.

In the pub alone

Some pubs ban smartphones, demanding punters rawdog their pint of John Smith’s. But if you arrive early? If your mate nips for a piss? What, do you just gaze into the middle distance, ruing every decision you’ve ever made? The landlord should actively encourage you to bounce between X, Instagram and TikTok.

On public transport

Those making speakerphone calls and blaring grime should be thrown off moving buses and trains, yes. Those hunched over Tinder swiping right on anyone briefly within radius of their chosen route? They have committed no crime. They should not be sentenced to read a book.

Anywhere you may be left with your own thoughts

The world is full of terrifying dead zones, places without naturally abundant content where your innermost thoughts bubble to the surface. Particularly dangerous are McDonald’s queues, when visiting parents and watching sunsets. Banning smartphones would overwhelm with despair, so for public safety they must be available.

Bed

Scientists say the blue light ruins your circadian rhythm, but scientists aren’t in bed with you. Drifting off to funny YouTube is one of the only joys left to us in this fallen world. Your phone is your alarm clock so this can’t change.

Short men fine except for short man personality, say women

WOMEN have confirmed they have no issue with short men’s physiques but dismiss them as romantic partners because of short man syndrome. 

While diminutive suitors believe they are overlooked because of their lack of height, women have confirmed the actual issue is their insecurity and aggressive behaviour in pubs.

Sophie Rodriguez said: “I quite like a short lad. They’re easier to fit on a sofa and you can borrow their trainers.

“But they’re always so bitter, so angry at the world, so steadfastly determined to prove everyone wrong by driving a massive SUV, getting jacked in the gym or picking fights with waiters who dare be over six foot that I can’t date them.

“They radiate resentment, leap to jealous conclusions and it’s too easy to lose them in crowds. And they go through your shoes telling you which ones you can’t wear.

“I know it must be hard knowing at any moment you could lose a fight, but I manage it without taking my suffering out on the rest of society, Joker-style.”

Tom Booker, five foot six, said: “It’s true. But women would happily put up with my prick personality if I was nine inches taller.”