Five fair, reasonable punishments for people who use their phones in the cinema

NO reprisal is too extreme for the subhuman scum who use their bright phones in dark cinemas. Even these punishments are entirely reasonable: 

Exile

Banishment from these shores is the soft option. When you’re approaching the climax of Gladiator II, where Paul Mescal is riding two rhinos at Caesar through a coliseum full of sharks while toting twin AK-47s, and some dick gets their illuminated rectangle out? Being shipped to St Helena is absurdly generous. They ruined your immersion in the story.

Being catapulted over the horizon

Forget about the logistics of sourcing and operating a trebuchet. Focus on how joyous it would feel to see them disappear over the horizon in a majestic arc, comparable to the narrative arc of Paddington in Peru. Such a spectacle wouldn’t just restore much-needed order to the nation’s cinemas, it would also bring the community together. There’s literally no downside.

Bringing back the stocks

Like iPods, society turned its back on placing people in stocks far too soon. Public humiliation is the only consequence that gets through to morons who film the ending of Wicked and put it on TikTok. For extra irony, spectators will be encouraged to video themselves throwing rotten fruit and bags of dogshit at them.

Tarring and feathering

Sounds quaint and rural, coating an individual in tar and covering them in feathers? In reality it’s an excruciating punishment, as painful as it is humiliating. Good. Inflicting it on transgressors will return cinemas to revered temples of quiet and darkness. Even a quick scroll during a Sky advert will be stamped out.

Force them into baby-friendly screenings

What could be a more fitting punishment? Having disrupted your screening with their phone, their viewing experience will be ruined by screeching infants who are strangers to reason. For repeat offenders, put them into Paw Patrol: The Mighty Movie or Thelma the Unicorn. They’ll never do it again, if they survive.

Man driving 2008 Fiat Punto not buying Jaguar because it’s 'gone woke'

A MAN working night shifts as a security guard and driving a 16-year-old Fiat Punto has abandoned plans to buy a Jaguar F-Type because the brand is now woke. 

51-year-old Wayne Hayes of Colchester had always pictured himself behind the wheel of a luxury sports car, but the recent rebrand means he is now envisaging driving a Porsche or Alfa Romeo to his minimum wage position instead.

He said: “This is what happens when you turn against your loyal customers. Go woke go broke, Jaguar.

“Just look at those multi-racial models. How can they expect a man like me, suffering the classic mid-life crisis while living in a flat above a kebab shop, to shell out £87,000 now? I don’t feel seen.

“What happened to aspiration? Where’s the appeal to their traditional audience who likes to flick through an old issue of Top Marques in the hut on a cold night when I’ve done everything in the Puzzler? It’s not that I’ve abandoned them. They’ve abandoned me.

“No, from now on when I tell the lads in Spoons what car I’m going for when my lottery numbers come up, it’ll be the Porsche 992 or that one Daniel Craig drove in the last film where he died. Until then I’ll stick with the Punto. It’s only got 165,000 miles on it so it’ll last a while yet.”

He added: “Mind you, electric charging would come in handy because I’ve got my mate Andy to fiddle my meter.”