MANUFACTURERS of high-end lingerie are hoping customers do not notice that nudity is not only better but cheaper.
Victoria’s Secret, Agent Provocateur and Marks and Spencer are continuing to sell their product as erotically necessary even though their intended audience much prefers it removed and on the floor.
Woman and lingerie wearer Sophie Rodriguez said: “It’s sort of like Polo mints conning us into paying for the hole.
“Obviously mainly I wear cotton knickers so large they cover my navel, but I do have a selection of wispy, lacy, barely-there underwear that cost loads, really ride up my arse crack and are quickly discarded.
“They cost loads, are worn for ten minutes and are deeply insubstantial. And go crotchless, assless or cupless and it’s even sexier apparently, which really gives the game away.”
Lingerie designer Helen Archer said: “The enduring appeal of lingerie relates to our perception and the balance between seeing and concealing, heightening suspense and rendering the whole experience more erotic.
“But basically you can’t improve on tits.”