ARE train drivers right to strike, or are they just in a mood?
As Southern rail enters its second day of strikes, drivers claim they are protesting safety risks caused by staff cutbacks, whereas bosses say they should just stop moaning and open the fucking doors.
Do you agree with the strikes? Here are both sides of the argument.
FOR
Train companies obviously bastards so it’s good to see them suffer, even if I am suffering more.
I support anything that prevents me getting to work.
Train conductor once found me hiding in disabled toilet without a ticket but let me off.
I must be kept safe at all times, like a special jewel, even if I basically do nothing but eat food and watch telly.
It’s good to have a new social group to hate.
Could meet sexy woman/man on crowded train platform then whisk them away for an all-day breakfast at nearby ‘Sky banner’ pub.
AGAINST
Public servants are supposed to be fat and jolly, or ideally some sort of cartoon dogs like out of those ‘Busy Town’ kids’ books.
They keep pulling this shit. Or is that the tube drivers? And their union boss is that big moody guy. Or is that the tube drivers? Maybe they’re the same. Do normal trains drive around on the tube sometimes?
If I’m too scared to stand up to my boss, they should be too.
They have too many unions with confusing names but annoyingly there isn’t one called BUMCLEF.
I wanted to be a train driver but now I work in this hateful office so they should count their fucking chickens.
